Real-world study of use patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome initiating oral decitabine and cedazuridine or intravenous/subcutaneous hypomethylating agents

We used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance potential confounders. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was utilized to compare real-world overall survival (rwOS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival, and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) among patients treated with oral DEC-C and IV/SC HMAs.

A total of 2101 patients with MDS were included, with 405 treated with oral DEC-C and 1696 treated with IV/SC HMA. After PSM, there were 399 patients in each treatment group; demographic and clinical factors were well balanced. Patients treated with oral DEC-C had a similar median rwOS (22.7 months vs 19.5 months; p = 0.57) and AML-free survival (16.1 months vs 14.3 months; p = 0.10) compared with patients who received IV/SC HMA; however, there were nonsignificant trends in favor of oral DEC-C. The median rwTTNT was significantly longer for the oral DEC-C patients than for the IV/SC HMA patients (9.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively; p = 0.02).

This real-world study is the largest to date to examine clinical outcomes among MDS patients who initiated oral DEC-C compared to IV/SC HMAs. While study results indicate comparable rwOS and AML-free survival among patients treated with oral DEC-C or with IV/SC HMAs, patients treated with oral DEC-C had a significantly longer rwTTNT. These findings support the use of oral DEC-C as an alternative to parenteral HMA therapy.